Advanced and Metastatic NSCLC Treatment Follow-up Visit
The treatment paradigm for non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experienced a substantial shift following the introduction of immunotherapy in the form of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). ICI-based regimens are now the standard of care for first-line systemic treatment of patients with NSCLC without actionable molecular mutations. Despite the benefits of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC, most patients ultimately develop resistance to ICIs. This represents a substantial clinical challenge, as there is currently no approved standard treatment for patients with disease progression after ICI therapy due to resistance. Distinguishing primary and acquired resistance to ICIs can play an important role in second-line treatment decisions and present an additional challenge.
Historically, chemotherapeutic agents were used as monotherapy in the second-line setting. More recently, angiogenesis inhibitors have demonstrated improved outcomes when combined with chemotherapy, however, the significant toxicities associated with chemotherapy indicate the need for less toxic second-line options. New data are emerging that demonstrate favorable efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy involving angiogenesis inhibitors combined with immunotherapy as second-line treatment of NSCLC. With the potential for new approaches in the second-line setting, clinicians may face challenges relating to the unique spectrum of adverse events and additive toxicities that can result. As patients often incorporate potential toxicities into their treatment preferences, clinicians need to accurately communicate adverse event data, as well as efficacy data to patients to arrive at optimal treatment decisions.
Let’s consider ICI resistance and 2nd-line treatment selection:
64-year-old patient with advanced and metastatic NSCLC presents to a follow up visit experiencing fatigue, and other adverse symptoms around their treatment.
Medical History:
Treatment History:
Current Status:
What type of resistance has occurred with the patient? How would you manage AEs related to antiangiogenic-based regimens? What role would molecular testing have in informing treatment selection
NEXT STEP
Practice shared decision making and involve the patient in this discussion.
Setting: Telehealth visit
Patient Name: Robert or Roberta Brown
Tasks:
__________________________________
Clinical Oncologist, Oncology PA and NP, Oncology Pharmacist